1. The author that I interviewed made his story up and certainly caused me to think about it.
2. The author made it very clear that it was both a tragedy and a comedy, it was a comedy for the elements imbedded into his writing, and a tragedy to try and read, because of all the spelling punctuation errors made.
3. The author intended that that characters in his story be worse than "normal" people to show that he had different insights on others.
4. It just came to him.

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Endgame

Can't believe that we are almost outta here. There's so much in highschool that I never got to do or get to do. That's what i want to talk about. I wanna learn certain things before getting sent off into an independent and scary world, where the baby talk becomes a satire for adults. I want to learn how to identify a business opportunity, how to reserve money for savings, open up a checking account, understand margins, interest rates, estimates, how to plan for retirement, 401k's, anything that will put me one step ahead of becoming homeless again. My mom has struggled far too long to see me end up where she avoided the most.
Read more

"On Self Reliance" Essay

 In the essay "On Self Reliance" by Ralph Waldo Emerson, Emerson tries to reveal the truth in his own way, which is very bluntly. He tries (and succeeds to open the readers eyes to the reality that is impure. He (from what I got) gives advise from the way he sees that people will be happiest. He gives a lot of expertise and helps to inform that you can rely n yourself to change yourself, improve, and succeed. I think he explained that the best way possible.  In the essay, his tone varies, it goes back and forth. He ranges from a regular guy to a seemingly awakened monk who has learned the meaning of life, or a wise old man, full of years of wisdom and experience.  His diction consisted of maybe a genius level of literature, that just flows right out of this man and straight into his writing, although its is hard to understand the first time around, it is much clearer once the literature is explained and "cleaned up".  His syntax was very well thought out, ...
Read more

Chapter 16 notes

Mustapha Mond brings the trio to his "office" and revises their previous actions and judges them for it, he then goes on about the importance of happiness and tranquility and how the natural order must be retained (thats what I got fron his speech), he also banishes Hemholtz and Bernard. Bernard freaks out and is put in a panic after hearing his sentence, but Hemholtz, on the other hand, is accepting of his sentence, and is willing to welcome his new life, free from the social boundraries, with open arms. Before this, Mond went on and mentioned that he knew that retaining this dystopian society, that he would have to potentially destroy its people with either its initial birth process or the soma fed throughout their lives to basically kill them from the inside out. But he says this was all in the name of keeping the happiness in their lives, unaware of the problems with their lives. Ignorance is bliss.
Read more